Zach Smith said:

This is the best analogy ever.

Click to expand...

IT ISSSSSSSS... BULLSHIT CALLS BY THE REFS DAY.

coachbleu said:

why would anyone get KICKED OUT of a contest for earnestly trying to perform sport within the rules?

Football: Hey, you have to tackle like this.
Me: Like this?
Football: Exactly, but your facemasks touched, and now you can't play anymore.

FUCK THIS SHIT
Who is it that wants targeting?
I've never heard one person that wants this rule, especially in its current format.

Click to expand...

This is the best analogy ever.

Cody L128 said:

Now I'm not saying I wouldn't take Downs back because I absolutely would. His talent is top 5-10 draft pick level. But Brayson Hubbard is allowing less completion percentage when targeted. Has more interceptions, And almost the same amount of stops around the LOS. This white DB is doing some work. Rolltide

Click to expand...

Stop it. He has 70 coverage snaps to Caleb's 206. And it's a better comp % by 7.8%.

He's playing really well but is not Caleb Downs.

coachbleu said:

How is Buckeye Nation feeling about Faggoting, I mean targeting?

Click to expand...

My issue is it's the refs that can't determine what a fucking target is.

You guys are 100% right! The rule is awful. It directly had an impact on Ohio State/Nebraska game. That targeting negated what was a turnover by Nebraska recovered by Ohio State. That's 1 extra possession for Ohio State, 1 less possession for Nebraska.

Bad calls like that make a huge difference in games. These refs need to be fined and demoted if it's proven they made a wrong or bad call. If the refs knew they would be fined for making bad calls, I think they would do a better job.

why would anyone get KICKED OUT of a contest for earnestly trying to perform sport within the rules?

Football: Hey, you have to tackle like this.
Me: Like this?
Football: Exactly, but your facemasks touched, and now you can't play anymore.

FUCK THIS SHIT
Who is it that wants targeting?
I've never heard one person that wants this rule, especially in its current format.

They just overturned that ruling yesterday. But I cannot stand the targeting scenario.

Zach Smith said:

It was processing (why I put the parenthesis). Should be good to go now!

Click to expand...

Cool. Thanks Zach

Buckeye33me said:

I can play the previous film room videos but latest one just shows black screen and says Encoding. Any ideas? Using an iPhone 14

Click to expand...

It was processing (why I put the parenthesis). Should be good to go now!

I can play the previous film room videos but latest one just shows black screen and says Encoding. Any ideas? Using an iPhone 14

Yeah we just need coaches who know their shit and can motivate a team and keep them hungry. What blew my mind was chip Kelly calling run plays that werent working continuously. Dudes a wizard, and kept running when we clearly haven't been able to run for 2 weeks. Coaches aren't on same page, We still don't rotate when backups (de) grade higher than starters, won't start arvell when imo he deserves it, Johnson's top flight ends can't get pressure facing a 3rd string tackle, corners are suddenly poor in coverage, oline development is abysmal, kicker is terrible, haven't returned a kick or punt for td since the clinton administration. Burke and Iggy's draft stock have taken some nice lumps the last 2 weeks. This does not feel like a national championship team. Not even close.

Nevada Cuck said:

Thought I smelled incests

Click to expand...

You're thinking of Auburn and Tenn fans sir.

Chef Buck said:

Well I wish the best for ya, you should probably look a little better and have more money than you do at this point in your life... But on a serious note I think our coaching staff might actually be ass. We are in trouble. 5x the talent of an Indiana and 1/5 of the ability of execute and adjust. Also I'm not sure our secondary is what we thought it was. Hopefully I'm over reacting.

Click to expand...

Chef Buck, I don’t think you are wrong.

I think that as a coach they will invariably have different strengths and weaknesses between recruiting, teaching, schemes, development, motivation, etc. I am starting to be concerned that we try to get an expert in one of those categories at the expense perhaps more well-rounded couches. Hartline’s prowess as a recruiter sometimes betrays his ability as a teacher, as Zach has said in the past. Coombs was a motivator but may not have been and ax’s and O’s guy. Would we be better suited to have coaches that are mediocre at more?

Going to dive into this forum. Been a follower for awhile now. Colonel tier for 2 years and I love the content. Best out there. Can’t wait to see this weeks OSU offensive breakdown!! Keep up the Great work Guys. Enjoy the show. Don’t be too hard on us gun carrying Californians. It’s awesome here in Temecula California. Go Bucks!

Buckeye NP said:

Jesus, I think ChefBuck just manifested Michalski’s injury…

ChefBuck, I’m not sure how this superpower works, but start talking about how rich and handsome I am before you lose it!

Click to expand...

Well I wish the best for ya, you should probably look a little better and have more money than you do at this point in your life... But on a serious note I think our coaching staff might actually be ass. We are in trouble. 5x the talent of an Indiana and 1/5 of the ability of execute and adjust. Also I'm not sure our secondary is what we thought it was. Hopefully I'm over reacting.

Jesus, I think ChefBuck just manifested Michalski’s injury…

ChefBuck, I’m not sure how this superpower works, but start talking about how rich and handsome I am before you lose it!